elapses: (b. i don't go for secretive games)
[personal profile] elapses
Last week during my "WHAT UP, CHUCK IS WAY TOO AWESOME" phase (which is not over but has lessened in intensity) my friend Ian was like "...so, is it better than Friday Night Lights?" (he has seen neither but he, you know, knows me). Questions like that are the bane of my existence. Like, why do people have to compare things with completely different tones? It just doesn't work! You would have to be a crazy person to stack up the O.C. next to the West Wing. Are they both awesome? Yes. Is one more awesome than the other? Well, okay, obviously yes, but the purpose of the two is so vastly different that it is almost unfair to say that. ANYWAY!!! A solution!

Let me introduce to you the Bones-Wire scale of television tone:



Where 1 is fan service (and that is not an insult-- we all know how I love my Bonez) all the way up to a 10 for gritty realism (I think-- I have never seen the Wire, because my tone comfort zone is 3-8. FINE, OKAY, more like 1-7). It's kind of a measurement of how seriously you have to take something to get something out of it.

Anyway, then you stack tone against overall quality! Et voilĂ ! Now when asked whether Chuck or Friday Night Lights is more awesome, you can come out with, "Well, Chuck and Friday Night Lights are both high quality, but Chuck is maybe a 4 or a 5 on the Bones-Wire scale, and I think Friday Night Lights comes out to a 8 or a 9 (if, of course, you disregard the second season)."*

*Unfortunately I can guarantee that no one will know what this means, so maybe you should not actually come out with it.

It can also be used as a predictor, i.e.:



(ACTUALLY, I think if you had a scale for "amount of heart" and then "ratings" you could pretty much have a fake fandom math number that could tell you everything you would ever need to know about a television show. However, uh, measuring heart. I am not sure that is possible.)


While we are kind of half almost talking about Chuck (AND I'M SORRY, because I do know that this is basically all I have been talking about lately which is probably crazy obnoxious-- but at least it's only this much! Because I was thinking of leading up to the finale with a Bakula a day. This one would have come first and you cannot tell me that would not have haunted you ALL THE WAY TO MONDAY), but have we all read this article? Specifically:

If, in two weeks, that is the last episode of the show to ever air, it will be one of the least satisfying finales of all time. Chris Fedak, the guy who created the show, said people will set their living rooms on fire.
Well, blerg.

Date: 2009-04-24 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] calikalie.livejournal.com
Not even going to lie here, but Chuck is basically the only thing I want to post about lately. It's crazy. Also, your graphs are so spot-on and awesome. I have the same problem when it comes to comparing shows.

Date: 2009-04-24 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
Oh, god, I KNOW. Yesterday my friend was like "It seems like you haven't posted in awhile, except you have. It's just all Chuck reaction posts." EVEN THIS ENTRY IS LIKE, 40% Chuck-related. I might need an intervention.

Date: 2009-04-25 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forthesky.livejournal.com
I TOTALLY WASN'T CRITICISING YOU WHEN I SAID THIS

Date: 2009-04-25 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
STOP RUINING MY DRAMATIC STORYTELLING

Date: 2009-04-24 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chibirhm.livejournal.com
I LOVE THAT YOU MADE THESE CHARTS. SO MUCH. ASKDJFLAKSDFJSKAD. YOU'RE LIKE MY OWN PERSONAL NATE SILVER.

Date: 2009-04-24 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
NATE SILVER HAD IT RIGHT: everything is better with visual aids incorporated into it.

Date: 2009-04-24 10:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stepliana.livejournal.com
I love that this makes perfect sense to me. Brava!

Date: 2009-04-24 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
This is totally one of my favorite things about the internet: the like-mindedness. I know if I used this explanation on Ian he would tune me out pretty fast.

Date: 2009-04-24 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silverstars.livejournal.com
I love how your brain works! That scale is PERFECT and it's totally the way I judge television too.

And yeah, I am totally incapable of talking about anything aside from Chuck lately too. I don't see that changing any time soon. I am a nervous wreck about this show getting renewed. :/

Date: 2009-04-24 11:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
I am glad you think so!

LOL I KNOW! I kind of feel bad (I counted, and 5/6 of my last few entries are Chuck-related, and 3 of those 5 are basically not at all accessible unless you are watching and caught up) because a pretty large portion of my flist doesn't watch it. But then I also don't feel bad, because they all really ought to be >:(

Date: 2009-04-24 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dudski.livejournal.com
Um, you can totally measure heart: It's directly related to the number of times I want to break down into a blubbering mess and shout "THEY ALL JUST LOVE EACH OTHER SO MUCH" over the course of a single season.

Date: 2009-04-24 11:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
It think it also bleeds over into the quality number: is season one of the O.C. really better than season one of Gossip Girl? YES, EONS, BECAUSE IT HAS COHENS.

Date: 2009-04-25 12:52 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-04-25 12:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thelittlespy.livejournal.com
I love your charts. And I feel like "the Bones-Wire scale" sounds important and professional enough that we could trick people into thinking it's a real thing. Let's do that!

Questions like that are the bane of my existence. Like, why do people have to compare things with completely different tones?
I haaaate that! Why do people have to compare things at all? I feel like, as a person who is enthusiastic about things, I get shit like that a lot. Like people want to poke holes in my enthusiasm, as if making me choose one over the other will invalidate what I've said for the "loser," like it'll mean I didn't REALLY like it that much.

I told my parents, who also watch Chuck about the quote from Fedak, and I think they may actually set their living room on fire. It's kind of adorable how much they like this show.

(I have no Chuck icon, so Lucille "it makes me want to set myself on fire!" Bluth will have to do.)

Date: 2009-04-25 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
It does have a certain not-fake ring to it. Or maybe it's that it sounds almost fake enough to loop around to real again. POINT BEING: we can work with this.

But you're right, there is this accidental, bumblingly malicious edge to that kid of question when the less enthusiastic people ask it. Why should I ever be asked to quantify my enjoyment of anything? But I kind of even hate it when it gets done by fannish sorts too, BECAUSE THEY SHOULD UNDERSTAND. (My least favorite thing is when people try to play the Bones vs. XF game, because while I know why they get stacked up next to each other, Bones is of course a 1 and X-Files I think is maybe a 7 or an 8-- which is a world of difference! Even if the very basic set up is the same [and it really isn't-- they both center around FBI partnerships and solving crimes but Bones is such an ensemble show now and the solving process is structurally very different in the two] because Bones obviously did draw inspiration from XF, you have to believe in the X-Files so much more to make the conspiracy plausible. Somewhere in there I stopped making sense, SO IN CONCLUSION, they are not comparable.)

Hee!

Date: 2009-04-25 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shimmeryshine.livejournal.com
LOL OMG CHARTS. You are my favorite.

My last like 10 posts have all turned into giant Chuck love fests, even if they don't start out that way! I LOVE IT THOUGH.

I heard that Re: Chris Fedak's comments on the finale making us "burn our living rooms" if it's the series finale, he has been saying recently that it almost acts as a first episode of season 3. That it whets the appetite for what Season 3 is going to be all about. So I think that's what he means by "unsatisfying" as a SERIES finale, rather than as an episode overall if the show gets picked up.

THIS ARTICLE (http://series.nu/Chuck/exclusive-nbc-renews-chuck/92/) says Chuck is getting a 13 episode order, but I have NO IDEA how legit this is. But it makes me feel marginally better! Things need to start leaking! I'm watching out for a more reputable source breaking the same news. If it is true, I hope those 13 are for the fall with the option of picking up the back 9. EDIT: Apparently Josh Schwartz says that rumor isn't true, but idk. Good rumors are a good thing at this point though I think.
Edited Date: 2009-04-25 01:11 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-04-25 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
\o/!

YEAH, your journal is like Chuck central lately. IT'S PRETTY AWESOME.

Oh, yeah, I totally agree. It sounds like it's going to be a badass episode, just, you know, not something we want to be left hanging with.

Good rumors are better than bad rumors! Ugh, though, I AM SO SELFISH ABOUT ALL OF THIS, I want a full season and if I have to have a half season, I CANNOT DEAL WITH WAITING UNTIL JANUARY.

Date: 2009-04-25 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shimmeryshine.livejournal.com
I AM SO SELFISH TOO. I want 22 which start airing in the fall! But, I will take what I can get. 13 is better than nothing.

Date: 2009-04-25 02:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
I know, I know, any renewal is so much better than no renewal and we are kind of between a rock and a hard place but... :(

Date: 2009-04-25 01:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stop-theworld.livejournal.com
I just-- I--

I LOVE THIS. This post, it fills me with indescribable joy, etc. YOU!

Date: 2009-04-25 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
YOU BRING ME GREAT JOY, TOO, ELIZABETH!
Edited Date: 2009-04-25 02:02 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-04-25 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondstar.livejournal.com
OH HEYYYYY
MY DAY OF ARRIVAL IS COMING UP FAST
*flails around*

Date: 2009-04-25 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondstar.livejournal.com
JUNE 1st!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Date: 2009-04-25 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
EXCITING!

Date: 2009-04-25 03:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] outofdoritos.livejournal.com
Haha I love how much you've thought about all this. Great charts - I agree with your assessment of TV and comparisons like that. :)

Date: 2009-04-25 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
Haha yeah, it was a matter of great stress that clearly required a lot of time and problem solving. Way more than the paper I should be writing!

Date: 2009-04-25 06:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] superskittles76.livejournal.com
YOUR CHARTS MAKE MY LIFE IDEK HOW AMAZING IS THIS POST?!?!

I have an irresistible urge to try to rate every show I watch or love according to these graphs. Although I have a feeling they all fall in the OOH SHINY area because I pick my shows for enjoyment and escapism instead of OMG AMAZING DRAMA THIS SHOULD GET AN EMMY.

No seriously, HOW MUCH DO I LOVE YOUR CHARTS LET ME COUNT THE WAYS :D

Date: 2009-04-25 06:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com
THAT MAKES ME REALLY HAPPY!!!!

I kind of want to do that too. VOYAGER IS SO A 1. Maybe a 2. No, it's totally a 1. But lol I am the same way, most of the 8-10 stuff boresssssss me. Escapism is so much more fun.

Date: 2009-04-25 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thatlldopig.livejournal.com
hahahahaha, you're brilliant.

Date: 2009-04-25 04:06 pm (UTC)

Profile

elapses: (Default)
elapses

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags