ext_26907 ([identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] elapses 2010-11-20 08:02 pm (UTC)

IT IS JUST SO MUCH LIKE, blonder and straighter when you look at what they were doing in the first film. Why is that so hard guys, SHE'D STILL BE REALLY PRETTY. But whatever. BUT UGH Y, both these two films have just pulled you straight into the story so TIGHTLY.

I loved when the popped up on the BEACH during the walking, and the mobile home thing was interesting too. And the one you said, HONESTLY THEY WERE ALL SO BEAUTIFUL, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY VARIED? But yeah it totally amped up the camping. The visuals/the pacing of the camping actually kind of erases the argument that the books need to be condensed to be correct for a movie format. They could have done so much!! Oh well, I'm really just glad they split this one. Even if I thought it was kind of a dumb/money-grubbing decision when I first heard.

I KNOOOOOOOOOW IT WAS MY FAVORITE. It came up so early, I was so shocked/surprised! Ron doing something useful! Having more sense than Harry! THIS NEVER HAPPENS IN THE MOVIES.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting