elapses: (crankypants)
elapses ([personal profile] elapses) wrote2010-08-03 06:07 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:

3 more days of chemistry, i might not make it


It just occurred to me that none of Rachel Bilson's future employers are probably ever going to care enough to employ her range of ridiculous facial expressions to their fullest, greatest extent. Ugh.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
WHY DOESN'T SHE GET MORE WORK?!

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
TOO BUSYING BEING A FASHIONISTA AND BEING BORINGLY ENGAGED TO HAYDEN CHRISTENSEN, I GUESS?

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL, SOMETIMES I FORGET ABOUT HAYDEN. Like, what's that all about? Were they in that movie together, Jumper or something? So stylish, Rachel. LET ME BE YOU, SORT OF.

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
THEY WERE, she has a thing for co-stars, I suppose you could say.
Edited 2010-08-04 21:44 (UTC)

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose you could. (But this kind of makes me sad.)

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
ME TOO. But I think I might have read something like two months ago that said they were on a break? POSSIBLY ON JEZEBEL, AND POSSIBLY FICTICIOUS. I am grossly overinvested in Brody/Bilson, Claire. GROSSLY.

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
They're never photographed together anymore? (WAIT, NEITHER ARE SIR JOSHUA AND DIANE, AND THIS IS SERIOUSLY MAKING ME QUESTION LIFE HERE. NO, IT'S OBVIOUSLY JUST DIFFERENT SCHEDULES. No, I'm serious, I'm not actually daring to think anything other than that or something similar.) LOL, Jezebel, reporting on celebrities. Brody/Bilson is not to be messed around with! I completely understand your investment!

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
YES BUT THAT IS EVIDENCE OF NOTHING and Hayden and Rachel is evidence of something, clearly, you know, by the rules of logic. AND LIKE JEZEBEL DOES ANYTHING ELSE.

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
WHATEVER, I CAN HOPE. Ryan and Rachel got back temporarily (EFF U, HATERS, WHO SAY IT WAS JUST A PHOTO OP), sooo. But ugh, Hayden, really? Hey! Jezebel reports on *~*women and their (women) problems*~*.

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I WILL NEVER STOP HOPING. And Jezebel is really really hit or miss for me, to no longer be facetious, half the time I agree with them and the other half it is like "...did you really just say that?" I mean actually the ratio is more like 75/25, but the 25 is always reaaaaally "really?!"ish.

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
My housemate read it a lot, and I started to read it after she'd always send me links to cute puppies or baby animals or whatever that happened to have originated from Jezebel. I don't read it that frequently, but sometimes, they have articles that are, like, how do I describe them — I'm not looking for an article on this or that, but then I find it, and it's kind of perfect? And half the time, it's like, "Oh, this is awkward to admit, but this is perfect." Embarrassing? IDK. But I don't think I read it enough to be able to form a real opinion about its content.

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it's not embarrassing! I really like the writing style of a lot of their writers, and they usually present their news in a way that interests me. And I like to read my celebrity gossip in a ~lady positive~ place. Plus they pick up some really amazing blogger essays along the way. All of which is why I do read it semi-regularly, but there is SO MUCH FILLER about terrible reality television, but sometimes I disagree with their byline on body image, and every so often they will be snarkily derisive about something in a way that bothers me.

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
A few months ago, a guy (who's gay, not that that really matters) I knew at school posted a specific Jezebel article — I don't remember which one, unfortunately — and said something about how the article exemplified what he didn't like about the site. Again, I don't really read it enough to be able to notice stuff like their body image byline (I wish I did), but I can sort of assume/figure out what people don't like about it? Sort of?

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you remember what it was that the article exemplified?

[identity profile] thecolorbetween.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
No, not at all, unfortunately! Sorry, I shouldn't have even mentioned it, since I don't remember it at all. It was a few months ago. Ugh, I really have absolutely no idea what it could have been about. :-\

[identity profile] adinfinitum.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
NGL THO HER INSTYLE "COLUMNS" LIGHT UP MY LIFE IDK IDK

BEING BORINGLY ENGAGED TO HAYDEN CHRISTENSEN, I GUESS?
WAIT, HAYDEN CHRISTENSEN STILL EXISTS? Proof or it's not true.

[identity profile] elapses.livejournal.com 2010-08-04 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
THEY ARE REALLY DELIGHTFUL, but it's kind of depressing because even though she's been moving away from acting and towards "I am so cute, LOOK AT MY CLOTHES" for awhile now this new job at InStyle cements that. SHE SEEMS REALLY HAPPY THOUGH, and it's not like she was a baby Meryl Streep, but. I am selfish and I like her face :(

FINDING PROOF WOULD INVOLVE WILLINGLY SUBJECTING MYSELF TO HIS FACE.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only